Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Hazel's avatar

Hail Caesar! Zuckerberg controls the masses by allowing spreading lies with the Daily Wire (and many more pages that steal content, etc.) Why isn't this considered plagiarism?

Idea theft in this form beats the death drum of quality journalism across the board.

The headline on Sign's suicide features a photo of the Clintons. My guess is no photographer got paid for the Daily Wire to use it. Would they have recompense if they sued or would some protection for FB be held in a disclaimer?

You can bet your bippy that ads generated by Daily Wire are making Little Caesar Zuck a lot of money. Therein besides his huge ego, is why this won't change. He rules the kingdom of FB globally. A sad fact is who is going to stop him?

Thank you Judd for at least annoying the hell out of him by throwing a headlight on FB high jinx.

Expand full comment
Lib's avatar

How is it the original reporting outlets don’t go after the Daily Wire for plagerism?

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts