From what I understand is most, not ALL, corporations now have some sort of non confrontational policy when it comes to shoplifters, so as not to open up their risk to employees. So then the question is if the corporation itself won’t pay for high quality security, why is the state now responsible for PRIVATE theft?? Oh right, that pesky…
From what I understand is most, not ALL, corporations now have some sort of non confrontational policy when it comes to shoplifters, so as not to open up their risk to employees. So then the question is if the corporation itself won’t pay for high quality security, why is the state now responsible for PRIVATE theft?? Oh right, that pesky corporate welfare again. Judd and crew, did you ask any corporations for their official policy on shoplifting? I’d love to see their responses!!
From what I understand is most, not ALL, corporations now have some sort of non confrontational policy when it comes to shoplifters, so as not to open up their risk to employees. So then the question is if the corporation itself won’t pay for high quality security, why is the state now responsible for PRIVATE theft?? Oh right, that pesky corporate welfare again. Judd and crew, did you ask any corporations for their official policy on shoplifting? I’d love to see their responses!!