The most galling part of this story is that Kroger chose to permanently close two locations because they didn’t want to pay the employees at those locations an additional $4/hr for 120 days as mandated by local government. They would rather endure the costs of shutting down both locations plus the loss of all future revenue generated by …
The most galling part of this story is that Kroger chose to permanently close two locations because they didn’t want to pay the employees at those locations an additional $4/hr for 120 days as mandated by local government. They would rather endure the costs of shutting down both locations plus the loss of all future revenue generated by those locations rather than paying the employees at those two locations. Kroger’s decision was despicable, spiteful, and the employees were caught in the middle.
The most galling part of this story is that Kroger chose to permanently close two locations because they didn’t want to pay the employees at those locations an additional $4/hr for 120 days as mandated by local government. They would rather endure the costs of shutting down both locations plus the loss of all future revenue generated by those locations rather than paying the employees at those two locations. Kroger’s decision was despicable, spiteful, and the employees were caught in the middle.