20 Comments
User's avatar
Babette's avatar

Wow! And that photo makes me sick!

pam smith's avatar

This photo should be a wake up call for the NCAA, the University of Georgia and their women athletes and recruits. The Athletic Director is probably up in arms over the testosterone in women's sports.

Nancy's avatar

I am not surprised that the media doesn't generally report the millions pouring into the Trump family, the blatant conflict of interest, and the proposal to send our money to the Middle East to compensate them for the war we are proactively spending billions of dollars on. Here's a thought, likely not original: DJT started the way because his sons have contracts with the Pentagon and he will be able to funnel money to his "buddies" in the Middle East, further greasing the wheels of corruption that comes back to his family. Could this all be purposeful--for the sole purpose of enriching himself and his family? That might be a war objective and one reason why he doesn't care when it ends. Someone reported on one of the media outlets that one of the Trump family members said that when his term was over, they would be the richest family in the world. So maybe the war is a well thought out and calculated to further enrich the family. Thoughts?

Michela A. C.'s avatar

Main Stream media has failed the world. They should all fall to the wayside and be relegated to National Enquirer status, or less.

Nanci's avatar

Hideous and yet typical, that the women are all hidden and squished together, while the men all stand in the front

Lesley's avatar

No self-awareness — no surprise!

Mark Stevens's avatar

Thank for all you do keeping the free press - free.

N Gehrke's avatar

Yes, but do check spelling of the word “receive” in the question.

WillieSquillie's avatar

From 12 years of Catholic school with nuns: "I before E, except after C."

Eduard Hiebert's avatar

Yes! And when it comes to English language rules, have you noticed words like science?

There are more but having dyslexia lost them when I first saw them.

M Virginia Hill's avatar

Hilarious - male support staff stand in FRONT of actual tennis winners.(

Mary Cobb's avatar

It has been their motto since the beginning. Back of the bus, Back in the closet, Back in the kitchen.

Theresa's avatar

Arrrggh, as to that photo

Mary Beth Horsington's avatar

How odd that the women athletes being “honored” are barely visible in the background while the men are front and center.

Eduard Hiebert's avatar

Judd, as a Canadian I very much like your reporting commentary and if you check back I not only subscribed, but also offered yours as a gift subscription to another.

However new to sub stack I never found a way to actually submit my proposal to you as sub stack perpetually moves almost all interactions within their guarded "pay to play" paradigm.

Except now when I opened another paid subscription with another I have learned a bit further how to navigate new contact within sub stacks constraints

Assuming you have access to your records, which will confirm the above, I invite you to make contact directly outside of sub stacks pay to play paradigm.

Best as we do today what may open the doors for a better tomorrow still available to us.

PS what does the "Also share to Notes" option actually invoke/accomplish? Or restack?

Wayne A Morris's avatar

Thanking you!

I'm not alone in being concerned with these issues, which the Mass Media elect not investigate & report.

Highlighting such matters to the general public is extremely important.

Recently, I've concluded that the use of the term "corruption" has become an acceptable norm (meaningless), when we are noticing criminal acts of Frauds & Deceptive Practices.

pam smith's avatar

This photo should be a wake up call for the NCAA, the University of Georgia and their women athletes and recruits. The Athletic Director is probably up in arms over the testosterone in women's sports.

jane's avatar

Thank you.

Jeffrey Jon Bode’'s avatar

Happy to read every Friday.

Eduard Hiebert's avatar

Calculated? Yes!!!

Well thought out?

By that choice of terminology, are you not inadvertently, not only weakening your own argument but also giving more air/substance to the very thing you would like to stop?