40 Comments
founding

No worries, efficiency and organization expert Pete Hegseth surely has a plan to fix this problem.

Expand full comment

The joke of the day!

Expand full comment

My thought exactly. What could go wrong?

Expand full comment

Having read Project 2025, I know that everyone who isn't wealthy is going to suffer, and it won't get better it will get worse. Still, there are groups that are targeted for the most misery first, and once they are dealt with the misery will be spread. So, this is what Andrea Pitzer is saying to expect and how to be safer and resist. https://substack.com/home/post/p-151702504

Get your passport updated. Since the Intelligence Community leaders just gave notice, watch the DOD to see what they do. https://open.substack.com/pub/spytalk/p/breaking-top-intelligence-igs-resign?r=f0qfn&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&comments=true

If their leadership leaves too, and Tulsi Gabbard fills the IC with Russian agents, will the DOD go along, or if their leaders stay will they hold out for the constitution?

Expand full comment

Yes, especially since he’s soooo experienced running large agencies! 🙄

Expand full comment

I know how several hundred billions can be pared from the DoD budget without endangering military preparedness and also reducing the risk of an accidental nuclear war: Zero out spending for the Sentinel ICBM program. The Physicists Coalition for Nuclear Threat Reduction, the Arms Control Association and the Union of Concerned Scientists (I belong to all three) have been working unsuccessfully for years to do this, but we are opposed at ratio of hundreds to one by industry lobbyists, not to mention the profound ignorance of the politicians and the general public.

I`ve devoted several of my own Substack posts to the topic.

Expand full comment

Definitely the best place to cut the budget is the DOD. They are a waste of money that could fund the fight against poverty and homelessness the world over. But, of course, the corporations that fleece the taxpayers would not like that and we know how Trump loves taking money from the taxpayers.

Expand full comment

The DoD budget could be cut in half with no impact on national security. It would have a severe negative impact on the job security of most of Congress because of the evil genius displayed by the war profiteering companies that place a facility or two in each and every congressional district. As mentioned by someone below, it is a huge jobs program. And it gives us planes that can't fly in the rain, tanks that go from the factory to being mothballed in the desert, MRAPs that go to local police departments, etc.

Expand full comment

DOD spending is never going to slow. It's a kind of middle class welfare for thousands.

Expand full comment

I'd say more like a bonus for the wealthy!

Expand full comment

I think Scott Galloway said it best. You need two department heads for a budget of efficiency?

Expand full comment

Failed Nation, def: military budget swamps all other spending & no one knows where the money goes.

Expand full comment
founding

The outlook is bleak with how well any future administration will handle any budget. But, we know that Trump has always relied on bankruptcy, and then outright gifts from billionaires for his expenses (legal and campaign). With the call out for High IQ revolutionaries, we have Pete Hegseth and Tulsi Gabbard and RFK Jr. to malfunction in any responsibility they are handed. [I assume that Matt Gaetz will never be approved.] I'm sure that Peter Theil can be enrolled to efficiently do away with government run Social Security and Medicare.

We know that Boeing can no longer function now that their top 5 (?) heads no longer have training as engineers. I remember my good friend (Chem Engineer trained at MIT) being fired by Raytheon in time to cut him out of a good pension. Not that the DOD is supposed to be humane or have a moral compass...!

Expand full comment

First, we fire all the MBAs.

Expand full comment

The on the ground jobs impact of these proposed efficiencies could be the shock treatment needed to get the working population to appreciate the Democratic Party’s policies more. Even appreciate progressive policies like the social safety net. The defense contractors who employ them will cut jobs immediately if spending is cut the way they say they will. If we examine this whole proposed group of cabinet members and their individual pet ideas I think we can take some comfort in the possibility that they will not only contradict the MAGA line but also contradict each other. EFFICIENCIES IN COMPLEX SYSTEMS WHEN TAKEN TO THIS EXTREME ARE EXTREMELY VULNERABLE TO CAHOS

Expand full comment

80-hour weeks for no pay? Sounds like a tough sell.

Expand full comment

“For no pay” isn’t taking into account the scrum of military contractors piling in for some extremely profitable- or guarding profits- back door lobbying.

Expand full comment

Where do we sign up to work 80 hours a week for free so Elon can keep milking the government for his contracts and keep being a billionaire who doesn’t pay enough in taxes?

Expand full comment

The view from 80,000 feet hasn’t changed. He didn’t really win the popular vote but ....

He continues to plan the appointment of unqualified dangerous people.

His buddy the richest man is concerned that we spend too much money.

States remain gerrymandered

The electoral college remains the hard point of manipulation that prevents democracy from working in our country.

Pundits on both sides are engaged in telling their audiences either lies or truths wth no guard rails.

Liberals continue to think of them selves as a purposed group of patriots even while they have essentially no clear unifying factor.

Conservatives warm up to enforce their control of us all.

I had an interesting, uncomfortable experience yesterday. At 9:30 in the morning I got a call from a friend who said he was in jail after a car accident in which the other driver was put in the hospital and might not make it … and would I help to bail him out. I recognized his voice and felt completely certain it was him. He is a good guy and I was shocked by this occurrence that was going to change his life. He was calling from custody so the number was blocked and I wasn’t able to call him back. That made sense. I had two convincing conversations with his attorney and received instructions about how to proceed. My wife and I headed off to the nearest bank, which from where we live, is a 40 min drive. We realized after we left in a hurry that we forgot my wife’s phone that contains the usual Facebook messenger way that we contact these friends. My wife was suspicious but I was completely convinced by my recognition of his voice even after she pointed out it could be an AI. Fake.

To shorten the story it was a scam of course. My friend was with his wife the whole time on their sailboat on their way to the Bahamas.

My point is that even after this resolved. Even after I declined the scamsters calls and they gave up, even after I had a video chat with my friend and long into the evening and night I emotionally still believed this lie; that some thing terrible had happened to my friend.

We hold our first amendment rights to free speech very tightly. Because of this we have allowed and essentially condoning the legality of lying to the public. Lying as a criminal act is only illegal for the result of the lie not the lie itself ( I believe). Politicians recently have elevated this tactic to stratospheric levels fueled and abetted by the most powerful tools to lie that man has ever conceived. And, as individuals we suck up this morass of tainted information with no direct way of knowing what is true and what is not. Our personal experience takes time to be affected by these lies and the process of waking up from one lie is often clouded or covered by subsequent lies designed to be ever more enticing.

My point is this is done on purpose in both the case of my phone call and in the political reality of how our country is run. Sticking to the high ground and behaving respectfully as President Biden has done, succeeding in doing good honest work, doesn’t effectively counter the lies. Even now, as we are about to witness, when the lies all come home to roost the wake up period is long and difficult and not at all certain.

Heather, today quoted Sarah Matthews, saying Trump is “drunk on power right now because he feels like he was given a mandate by winning the popular vote.” This is the first time I have read any words referring to anything that might begin to generate an understanding that the reason for his lies and his success is that he is a power addict.

There is no off ramp in view. Our leaders of the Democratic National Committee who have failed to stop gerrymandering and have done nothing to change the electoral college’s propensity to place someone in office of whom we didn’t approve, proceed slowly and methodically to elect, who, what? Why do we even care?

As you can see my attitude is degrading. Time to take a step back.

Expand full comment

Why is it the job of the DNC to solve the gerrymandering? Gerrymandering is more prevalent in states controlled by Republicans!

Expand full comment
founding
5 hrs ago·edited 5 hrs ago

80-hour weeks for no pay? Imagine how much we will save when Musk et al mandate that for federal employees and military personnel.

Thanks PI!

Expand full comment

Typical Moron Musk, has to get other people to come up with the ideas that he can steal and claim as his own.

Expand full comment

I'm not saying that we should maintain the DOD budget, but you all realize that one of the main reasons why the USA maintains it's world hegemony and we all have this standard of living here is thanks to the gigantic army we have, right? I'm also not saying that there isn't another way to achieve that (of course there is). However, if you're a Republican (who voted for Trump or not), you definitely think that there is no other alternative to a strong military based on how we arm wrestled the world into compliance with the capitalistic empire. Sometimes it truly feels like to bubble realm not talking to each other ...

Expand full comment

A huge army that's about to become much smaller as soldiers and sailors head for the exits rather than serve under a slime bucket like Hegseth.

Expand full comment

Not to mention the deterioration in readiness resulting from the replacement of professionals by political hacks.

Expand full comment
founding

You are venturing into the heart of what the DOD is all about. The logical absurdities have me thinking of outbidding Russia to enroll North Korea's soldiers to do our dirty work...takes me into the far reaches of how insane we could go under Trump.

Expand full comment

U.S. hegemony is immoral and counterproductive, Kills millions in other nations and grievously wounds our soldiers physically and mentally.

Expand full comment

Thanks Judd.

Expand full comment

Saw an article lasr week. It was saying that Musk's opinion was to cut interest payments on the money the government has borrowed. Try doing that with your mortgage or credit card payments. Another item was that he could eliminate EVERY employee in government and still not come close to the budget cuts they want.

Expand full comment