11 Comments

Not the surprise I was expecting! A nice way to start my Wednesday!

Expand full comment

I’m suspicious. What’s his angle?

Expand full comment

This is always my thought when a known conservative hardliner starts saying something I agree with, lol.

Expand full comment

If Justice Clarence Thomas is right about an issue, it's probably by accident.

Expand full comment

True. Happy accidents are welcome!

Expand full comment

Very interesting article. Who would have guessed that Judge Thomas would have issued this opinion, which would put limits on the unrestricted ability of media to avoid responsibility for posts which clearly should be deleted.

Expand full comment

Posts by protected corporations. What a scam. Only individual citizens should benefit from 1st amendment protections.

Expand full comment

Thank you, Judd. I understand all of this. For me, the problem is ascribing citizen's constitutional rights TO CORPORATIONS. If we re-read your article from the perspective of a system which only gives first amendment rights to individual human beings, and denying the absurd notion that"money is speech", many of our democratic stresses would be instantly solved.

Expand full comment

This is the quality content I am here for - brilliant work!

Expand full comment

2020 just throws us one curveball after another, wow.

Expand full comment

This is what made me double-take:

"REPEAL SECTION 230!!!" ~@realDonaldTrump Oct 6

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1313511340124917760

Expand full comment