261 Comments

I think it would almost be more difficult to research, but can you report on companies that are actually doing good and I'd want to support? I've completely changed my consumer habits based on your research, so thank you for all you do.

Expand full comment

I want to figure out a way to do this without feeling like I'm doing PR for various companies. Most companies are a mix of good and bad. But it's an important question I'd like to explore.

One step we have taken is to continue to keep track of the companies that made pledges after January 6. The companies in the first two categories have kept their pledges thus far: https://popular.info/p/the-january-6-corporate-accountability

Expand full comment

Yeah it's getting tougher and tougher to decide how to vote with my dollars. There are LOTS of places I don't go, but a list of places I should go to would be awesome. Maybe a cross reference of their political donations/footing and their stance on things like climate, sustainability and employee treatment...

Expand full comment

I completely agree and rely on the research and insights you give us. It seems that a second entity might emerge, something like chop wood carry water to list companies to support and companies to not support and how to be in touch with them . It would be great if we could have mass action directed by a knowledgeable, organized person or group. I would subscribe in a heartbeat

Expand full comment

Action of the day Alert. A specific action to influence an individual/corporate entity working toward fairness/equity/justice. Name, address, phone, email...and suggested core message.

Mobilize thousands!

I am in my seventies but I can wield a keyboard...and would set aside time every day to take action.

Expand full comment

Action of the day Alert. A specific action to influence an individual/corporate entity working toward fairness/equity/justice. Name, address, phone, email...and suggested core message.

Mobilize thousands!

I am in my seventies but I can wield a keyboard...and would set aside time every day to take action.

Expand full comment

Brilliant!

Expand full comment

That's why I subscribed to Popular Information! It's extremely important that someone keep track of this. Excellent work!

Expand full comment

I think it is wrong for any business or organization to contribute to political agendas. Any money should come from individuals and there should be caps on how much they can contribute.

We can boycott a grocery chain, we can boycott products, but if we have to chisel down boycotting suppliers and manufacturers and then to farmers when does it end?

Let's stop the practice of using big money in politics and get back to the individuals.

Expand full comment

Nice concept, but SCOTUS' Citizen's United decision effectively sabotaged our American democracy. We've got a long way to go to fully regain peoples' power via the ballot box.

Expand full comment

Really good to know. I already see companies that I can support w my shopping habits.

Expand full comment

Patagonia?

Expand full comment

Always good to keep a watchful eye on private equity's expanding role in healthcare.

Expand full comment

Private equity is buying up everything. This can only be fixed by regulations.

Expand full comment

Right now what is concerning me most is that seemingly all media are forecasting the results of the election. It is a great disservice to voters. Between the polls and the billions of dollars flowing in to support election deniers and incompetent candidates, our so-called democracy veers further and further away from “we the people.”

Expand full comment

The very first edition of Popular Information I wrote, in July 2018 was headlined "Ignore the polls" https://popular.info/p/1-ignore-the-polls

Expand full comment

And I subscribed soon thereafter. Found you first on Twitter

Expand full comment

Totally agree. It feels like the constant analyses and poll watching becomes self-fulfilling prophecy.

Expand full comment

Frankly, I think a law should be passed to not allow the political (that absurdly autocorrected to plotical… hmmm plot… ical… somehow seems more correct!) BS abundant in today’s political ads especially like Marco Rubio’s ads… sickening!!

Expand full comment

Any chance of something like fairness doctrine passing? Or truth on political ads?? Ie political ads must be fact checked by 3rd independent source?

Expand full comment

We once had a fairness doctrine. The right wing worked to overturn it so Rush could talk unopposed

Expand full comment

Can they / is it possible to restart it or something like it? Facts do matter.

Expand full comment

Too much money would object.

Expand full comment

Since the explosion of cable, then internet nnws, recovering any sense of fairness in our information streams is one of the most critical issues of our times. There's good reason Alex Jones' cesspool of propaganda is titled 'Info Wars.'

Expand full comment

I could not disagree more. Politics is the application of the will of “We the People”. In you are not involved in politics then someone else is making decisions about you for you. You either have a seat at the table, or you are on the menu.

Expand full comment

Democracy is the will of the people, and it’s being subverted by money.

Expand full comment

Agreed, even the right-leaning media is all doom and gloom. If they could use those seconds and minutes to talk about the Biden Administration's accomplishments and The Supreme Court's

extreme/authoritative decisions, we'd be better off.

Expand full comment

I agree,if the bought and sold supreme Court in a 5 to 4 decision never ruled the way they did in Rie v Wade fifty years ago think of all the people who would be alive.

Oh you mean the present court. I see, the 5 to 4 decisions liberals made were ALL correct but the 5 to 4 decision s the conservatives made were ALL wrong.

Got it.

Expand full comment

Alive? That’s all you git? Unwanted, born into intense poverty, in foster care their entire lives, never adopted. Lived a life of crime, sexually abused, on the streets… you only see what you want to see… but not reality for too many. Abortion should be safe and legal. Otherwise, force MANDATORY VASECTOMIES ON ALL MALES OVER 12. And no more boner pills.

Expand full comment

But why does Stacey Abrams constantly deny she lost, I don't understand.

Expand full comment

Perhaps because her opponent was the Secretary of State (who ran the election). At least it looks like a conflict of interest.

Expand full comment

She lost because of the thousands of voters who were removed from voter roles by the SoS. I wish I had a link to reference it, but Greg Palast reported on it.

Expand full comment

*rolls

Expand full comment

She allege voter suppression which the facts support based on # of people removed from voting rolls. She didn't ask to find xxx # of votes or organize an insurrection. She created an organization to encourage and register more to vote (vs asking extremists to get their guns and sit outside of voting locations intimidating voters which is illegal!)

Expand full comment

Is it possible to find out what's going on within the military with regards to "dangerous elements" like General Mike Flynn's brother Charles (another general) and other MAGATs still being on active duty? Are the MAGAT types being quietly mustered out?

Expand full comment

A grave concern. And in police forces as well (which have been armed with military equipment).

But I can tell you, the military will actively squelch this information in the name of "national security." Getting in behind the scenes will be tough.

Expand full comment

Agreed. But if there is information out there on this specific topic, I am interested in knowing.

Expand full comment

I did a Google search on "investigation of extremists in American military" It provided several excellent sources of info, but about a year old:

Anti-Defamation League https://www.adl.org/blog/extremism-in-the-us-military-problems-and-solutions

Rand Corporation: https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PEA1447-1.html

Center for Strategic and International Studies: https://www.csis.org/analysis/assessing-pentagons-progress-countering-extremism-military

Homeland Security Digital Library: https://www.hsdl.org/c/assessing-extremism-in-the-u-s-military/

DoD's Report on Counter Extremist Activity in DoD, December 2021: https://media.defense.gov/2021/Dec/20/2002912573/-1/-1/0/REPORT-ON-COUNTERING-EXTREMIST-ACTIVITY-WITHIN-THE-DEPARTMENT-OF-DEFENSE.PDF

Expand full comment

+1

Expand full comment

Just watched Frontline doc on Mike Flynn and his "followers" - the all-in christo-nationalists Trump supporters. It's scary how military are trained to be JSOC, Intelligence and infiltrating Middle East Islamic empires, playing THEIR game. But when they come back to USA they hold tight to their training, start their own militias, have been so indoctrinated in military that they can't revert to being civilian. THIS is a big part of the problem with so-called fringe groups, hate groups' proliferation. How can the military train, brainwash them for intelligence efforts, then do NOTHING to repatriate them to civilian life. THIS IS A GIANT DISCONNECT. We're reaping what we sowed to "save" Iraq, Afghanistan, et al from the "heathen infidels", only to see our own homegrown "heathen infidels" like Flynn, Stone, Proud Boys, Oathkeepers, 3 Percenters, etc. rise to threaten democracy right here. The military training has a lot to answer for.

Judd, do you have the resources to take a dive into the brainwashing of and by the military that allows no room for return to civil society for these young people? It scares me to my core!

Expand full comment

I watched the Frontline episode about Michael Flynn after reading your comment. He and his family have started a dangerous grassroots Christian nationalist cult. I don’t know that the military is to blame entirely; his mother instilled their family political and religious ideology. Certainly, the military built on that bedrock. For Judd, who is funding their movement? Frontline only touched on it, looks like mostly dark money.

Expand full comment

Leah, good point about the influence of Flynn's mother on the heavy dose of religion on their upbringing. She obviously inculcated a deep faith that was more than just religious as she dragged them to rallies, Catholic indoctrination marches. I didn't include that because I was gobsmacked by the outsized mental gymnastics that the military performed on their brains, without a corresponding retraining after their military work was done. Our DOD has some explanations due to civilians as well as former military who can't quit the mental and emotional training to return to "civil" society. They've created monsters of some, without the rewind back to being human. Robotic killers and agents who have no capacity to unlearn on their own, now turn to fringe groups of like minded killers and avengers in America!

Expand full comment

Bloody well said Barbara. Agreed!

Expand full comment

Also would like to know.

Expand full comment

I don't know how to answer Christine, I'm not sure what you want to know.

Expand full comment

No one is asking for your answer, hope that helps

Expand full comment

Now the troll who approached with insults makes a big fuss about other "people" sending HIM civil texts. If only he could find it in his heart to maybe emulate their behavior, instead of whining when someone responds to him in kind eh?

Expand full comment

Adam

I think it's a compliment when people send civil texts. I never "made a fuss" about it.

Please stop embarrassing yourself, explain why I'm wrong and I will take it to heart but hurling what you believe are insults but I take as a compliment does not help solve any problems. Unless you truly believe that the only way to solve what you consider a problem is to get all citizens who don't agree with you to leave.

Have a safe day

Expand full comment

This is how you ended your introduction to me:

"Please , try to use a little common sense when it comes to the men and women who protect your right to write such diatribe."

There was no diatribe from me you nit. Only you, who it appears never served anyway. Now intercourse yourself. You don't rate a civil reply from me with your disingenuous BS!

Expand full comment

Adam, all I said is you misread what was written then. And if course you did it again. I answered you trying to help you but all you can do is write what you think is an insult. When it comes from some like you it's actually a compliment. So thank you sir, have a safe day.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Oct 27, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

I see and agree that he is comical. It's all "I know I am but what are you?" That bloody loser tries to play the part of the victor, but he knows he's been beaten like the bad dog he is.

Expand full comment

That one claims to engage "civil" discourse but that is NOT how the miscreant approached me. He came in with insults, insinuations, distortions and misplaced RW hyperbole. Dismiss that troll.

Expand full comment

Adam,

If you bothered to read what I wrote, which it's obvious you didn't, I said numerous people on both sides sent ME civil texts. I know it's hard for people who think there correct and everyone else is wrong to really read what was written but it would help you to stop embarrassing yourself.

Expand full comment

Sorry, but Master Sergeant Aune did ask me to answer him. I know when someone uses logic and facts it disturbs you but that is not my problem.

You would be amazed how many likes and civil questions I receive daily from both sides. Educated people know that if all people, from all sides, do not communicate then both parties win and we lose.

Have a safe day sir.

Expand full comment

So you want military people of 25 or 30 years experience "mustered" out because they have a different opinion from you. If that happens don't you think ALL of them would be recalled to active duty, and yes they ALL can be recalled, it's military law, when the next Republican is elected president. And then ALL the wokegenerals would be mustered out to the next Democrat wins. Then it starts all over.

Do you know high military officers almost to a person refuse to vote because they want to remain no political.

Please , try to use a little common sense when it comes to the men and women who protect your right to write such diatribe.

Expand full comment

Jack - I'm a retired Master Sgt. You seem to think this is about a difference of opinion, but what I'm talking about is people who hold extremist militaristic anti-American views who are in the military and on the police force. I encounter many of them in and after military service. We have no business training and harboring these anti-Americans in our military and police force. The "high military officers ... (who) refuse to vote" to remain apolitical are concerned about these extremists' anti-American political beliefs and the fact that the extremists don't share the military's apolitical philosophy. Please read about the issue before foisting your assumptions on others. Thanks!

Expand full comment

Well said Christopher- as a former DOD mid level manager- we never discussed politics & all took an oath to the Constitution. I had top secret clearance & it upsets me so much all the preferential treatment TRUMP et al are getting. I’d have been fired before sundown if I took secret Intel & immediately prosecuted. These folks are cocky - is it because they know they are above the law?

Expand full comment

Ignore “Jack.” He May or may not be an actual person; in any case, he or it is only here to cause trouble. See Stacy Abram remark above.

Expand full comment

I can assure you I'm real. And yes, ignoring someone who voted for Biden but only because he was the lesser if two evils us the best way to fix the country's problems.

Let's all ignore everyone who has a different opinion, that way nothing can be fixed and our grandchildren will I herit our problems.

Great idea.

Expand full comment

Yes, the woke generals are extreme and very very dangerous to our country but "mustering" them out will just cause a tit for that. As for reading about the issue before I foster assumptions on others, you may want to look in the mirror. You have no idea what I have read. What I have taught. To whom I have spoken. You just assumed because if your liberal views that I'm an idiot who knows not what I speak of. I can assure you you are wrong sir

Thanks!

Expand full comment

Just your use of the term "woke" as a pejorative says all anyone needs to know about you Jack. The term "woke" actually refers to being aware as in being aware of one's history and the history of one's country, warts and all. It's about accurate history, not the whitewashed kind. It's about things that you clearly don't understand. Perhaps you should toddle on over to some other forum that would welcome your extremist point of view.

Expand full comment

I can't use woke but you can use all the insulting words you want. And no, woke, does not mean what you said. It means no birders, ket EVERONE in, no questions asked. It means both my high school granddaughters have to have men in their locker rooms. It means using the rest rooms with men. It means my seventh grade granddaughter asking my daughter what anal sex is because she was taught it in SEVENTH grade.

That's what woke really means, not your ignorant explanation.

Thank you for your service

Expand full comment

Just a point… children need to be taught about sex at an early age BECAUSE THAT IS WHEN ABUSE STARTS. Too many kids have been sexualized for YEARS before they are taught anything about it. And if your 7th grader had not heard of anal sex by the time she was 12-13?!?! Insane. Especially TODAY. Has she started her period? Do you know? Don’t be a great- grandfather soon!! No more abortions!

Expand full comment

You engage in dishonest hyperbole time and again. Therefore I have no more consideration to waste upon you with your insincere and extremist malarkey. Do humanity a favor and top yourself. Otherwise, consider yourself on "ignore."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woke:

Woke (/ˈwoʊk/ WOHK) is an English adjective meaning "alert to racial prejudice and discrimination" that originated in African-American Vernacular English (AAVE). Beginning in the 2010s, it came to encompass a broader awareness of social inequalities such as sexism, and has also been used as shorthand for American Left ideas involving identity politics and social justice, such as the notion of white privilege and slavery reparations for African Americans.

The phrase stay woke had emerged in AAVE by the 1930s, in some contexts referring to an awareness of the social and political issues affecting African Americans. The phrase was uttered in a recording by Lead Belly and later by Erykah Badu. Following the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri in 2014, the phrase was popularised by Black Lives Matter (BLM) activists seeking to raise awareness about police shootings of African Americans. After seeing use on Black Twitter, the term woke became an Internet meme and was increasingly used by white people, often to signal their support for BLM, which some commentators have criticised as cultural appropriation. Mainly associated with the millennial generation, the term spread internationally and was added to the Oxford English Dictionary in 2017.

The terms woke capitalism and woke-washing were coined to describe companies who signal support for progressive causes as a substitute for genuine change. By 2020, parts of the political center and right wing in several Western countries were using the term woke, often in an ironic way, as an insult for various progressive or leftist movements and ideologies perceived as overzealous, performative, or insincere. In turn, some commentators came to consider it an offensive term with negative associations to those who promote political ideas involving identity and race.

Expand full comment

Please define 'woke'? In the most basic terms it means awareness of inequality and supporting equality and justice for all regardless of race.

So I take it, you don't believe all men and women are equal nor care for them to be treated as equal since anti-woke?

Expand full comment

Read any of his posts and your question will be answered Ann. He's a professional troll. But if you try to pin him down, he'll wriggle and squirm and try to convince you that somehow you misunderstood what he wrote. In a word, gaslight you.

Expand full comment

Wow. Aren't you the insulting one Jack? I merely asked a question. I did not state a desire. You may wish to try reading for comprehension. However, to directly address your assertion, my common sense tells me that supporting a traitor is a lot more than "a difference of opinion" there Jack. I was a Marine for 6 years and I have a right to my views, one of which being that MAGATs have no place in the military period, because their loyalty lies not with the Constitution but with a con man. Surely you would not want the country put at risk of an actual coup, because of some people who believe that a free and fair election should be overthrown. That would make you a traitor too.

Expand full comment

Ignore him. See above.

Expand full comment

You're right. He never replied to what was actually said anyway, then he built a strawman of what was not said, to have something to react to. He's been outmanned, outgunned and outdone. What's more is he knows it although he can't admit it. He'll just keep wriggling. Futilely and furiously. But as you suggest, he is now on "ignore" since he has nothing useful to say. Perhaps he'll go away.

Expand full comment

I'm insulting? Sono marine is for that matter any military person who voted for President Trump has any right to be in the military. So when the next Republican is elected president, and if you are half as smart as you think you are you know it will happen, dies that mean EVERY military person who voted for the previous Democrat has to be thrown out? And if no, why? Because people who voted democratic like you live our country but people like me who vote for the BEST candidate no matter the party are to stupid to know what we're doing.

Maybe you should talk to family members, I bet there is at least one "stupid" person in your family who voted for the best candidate not just the ultra liberals like you..

Thank you for your service.

Expand full comment

Jack - As was said. Being a traitor is not a “different” opinion.

Expand full comment

Continually chalking dangerous extremism up to “difference of opinion” is nonsense.

If you drive & think a Porsche is the most beautiful car in the world & I drive & think a Ferrari is the most beautiful car in the world, that’s a difference of opinion. We can hash out views on performance, quality, style, etc. Then we both drive away in our nice cars.

If you think a Porsche is the most beautiful car in the world & that anyone not driving one is a bad person & should be captured, tortured, forced to say a Porsche is best, give up my Ferrari or else face murder, then you are an extremist. You want me to not only erase my opinion but to face harsh consequences for having a difference of opinion.

See how difference of opinions vs extremism views work?

What these rogue ex military groups want is conforming, by any means necessary, violence to minimize, disenfranchise, remove the rights from or legally eradicate those who don’t agree with them.

We must do sobering to de-program former military so they can be stable & empowered here, to live in peace with disagreement instead of recreate a pseudo-military life where they act like the very “extremists” they fought. We hardly prepare young people to go into the service. The least we can do is help them adapt when they finally come out of it!

Expand full comment

Bravo! Very insightful.

Expand full comment

Wow! Tiffany. That is taking the bully by the horns and making paste of him. Well said indeed. Agreed! As Christopher Aune exclaimed, "Bravo!"

Expand full comment

You could comment on the despicable treatment of John Fetterman after his debate by the so-called mainstream media, which largely ignored most of the outrageous things Oz said -- such as having local elected officials decide whether or not a woman can control her own body.

Expand full comment

Right. He said only a woman, her doctor and local politicians should be involved in a woman's health care decisions! WT actual F?

Expand full comment

& MSM clearly supports Walker who clearly has visible neurological problems & Trump who has alleged dementia. MSM really went after Fetterman -- ruthlessly. Seems MSM moguls are Rs & want R rule. They are so biased when for most debates they claimed GOP candidates won & the extremest GOP candidates were unprepared & horrible. Mehmet OZ has unlimited cash from wife's millionaire family too & that is never mentioned.

Expand full comment

Indeed. But even on this forum, we have those would claim otherwise. MSM does promote a skewed POV even as the talking heads claim to be fair and balanced. You can't be fair when you balance nonsense against sense (or things that actually happened) as though both are equal in meaning and import.

Expand full comment

What’s happening at the US Post Office? Its role in elections is vital. I have not heard anything about the controversial postmaster general DeJoy for quite some time.

Expand full comment

He's still there. Here's an update from American Prospect: https://prospect.org/politics/dejoys-continued-job-security-depends-on-bidens-next-move/

Expand full comment

Thanks so much for your answer, Judd. It would be interesting to see how the changes on the board plays out in Nov. and Dec. There are so many key flash-points involving the US Postal Service. For example, the article also made the point that not only is it important for elections, but now also for reproductive rights. The Postal Service also offers a chance to see how the government might address environmental policies (electric trucks). Then there's the issue of what possible privatization might bring. So, what's going on at the Post Office other than the new Ruth Bader Ginsburg stamp?

Expand full comment

Exactly. Wondering the same thing.

Expand full comment

I'd like to see some deeper insights into the failure of our current election system. Many people are moving to support versions of Ranked Choice Voting. And the election system is obviously under control of the two major parties ... by laws that those parties wrote and enacted.

We can't get an open competition among multiple candidates, and it's apparently very hard for independent and very small party candidates to get on the ballot. And good candidates are excluded from debates within the two major parties. The two major parties even control who will appear on the presidential debates and actively disinclude qualified candidates, and bias time toward the party favorite.

I observe this, but my version is pretty random and undocumented. I'd love to see a deep dive into the troubles with our plurality election system, how good candidates get "primaried," and political party control of redistricting, plus term limits, and how poorly qualified candidates get elected because their rich owners pay to win the election. etc.

Expand full comment

This really would get to the heart of many problems we see with our political system today. I second investing this further.

Expand full comment

Yes to ranked voting! I think there are a couple states - or maybe just counties - that are doing this?

Expand full comment

Alaska is using RCV. Nevada is voting on a midterm ballot referendum on implementing RCV. In Indiana, Republicans have outlawed the right to petition for a ballot initiative. Florida has outlawed RCV. Pretty un-democratic and very authoritarian.

Expand full comment

Another second on this one. I'm a long time independent who always voted for the best candidate regardless of party. That doesn't work anymore because the two parties are so bent on not working together for the good of the people. Ranked choice voting seems like a good possibility to help -- but I haven't researched it yet. Need to because that's on our ballot this go around.

Another issue is with all these PACs and big money that are party related. There are multiple PACS on both sides funneling money in to get their candidates elected. It's like who can pay the most to get elected -- not who has the best candidate or platform. Both sides are literally working to buy their seats in congress.

Expand full comment

RCV is the solution that will restore our lost democracy IMHO.

Citizens United is anti-American because it allows money to become an amplifier of certain people's free speech.

And ForwardParty.com is the way.

Expand full comment

A little discussed aspect of the abortion debate is the outcome of unwanted pregnancies among women who are unable financially or emotionally to care for a child. Amy Comey Barrett would have you believe that we can adopt ourselves out of this dilemma. We can't. Some of these pregnant women are already unhoused or in precarious circumstances. Their poor nutrition and/or mental health will add to the problems of their children. Caring for a child with special needs is extremely taxing, especially if there are other children in the home. There are tens of thousands of children already languishing in foster care, and this will only add to the burden. Plus, of course, we stubbornly refuse to address the problem of adults and children already without a roof over their heads. And then there are the Church and other institutions, religious and otherwise, where child abuse is tolerated. We are not a child-friendly society, and adding to the population of dependent children is going to exacerbate the problem. Outlawing abortion is just the beginning of the problem for the "unborn."

Expand full comment

Agree progwoman! All these red states are abysmal at taking care of

their poor, elderly and the children in

foster care. Our food bank is feeding over 80 thousand, mostly

elderly and children here in Arkansas. PBS did an investigation

when the state cut Medicaid to Work so severely here, people were

dieing because they couldn't get

their medications. Look at Mississippi and Louisiana! If the

GOP takes over the government,

a National ban on abortion will be

one of their primary goals. It will

only get more extreme for the

unwanted babies and children.

Expand full comment

Eighty thousand is a huge number! And that's just food. In the rural food bank where I sometimes volunteer, we give food to the equivalent number of our population every time, and we were told it is acceptable not to check eligibility, because almost every person in that area qualifies. There are already a lot of very needy people in our nation, and an unintended pregnancy has huge ramifications.

Expand full comment

This is just the primary food bank

here I'm talking about. We have others that provide meals for kids

in school and some charities that

help with living expenses. The state

legislature rules. AR was recently

ranked 4th worst state to live in.

I know 3 'girls' who already have 1

or 2 children with no father. They

never finished high school and

can't get a job. Their parents are

split up and doing their own thing.

SNAPS was just cut here again.

We should be taking all of these

states apart and showing exactly

how they allocate and cut benefits

to their state and fed programs.

Follow the money!

Expand full comment

That's why those who support bans support them. It's all a part of their plan.

Expand full comment

GOP want women pregnant & in the kitchen to use an old expression. some GOP said they fear college educated women. If you control women's reproduction-- you control women. & if women are jailed for felony murder- they can't vote. GOP are going after contraceptives next & suffrage won't be far behind. they aren't hiding it. people are so radicalized -- GOP know they will not lose a vote.

Expand full comment

I've always thought it would be pretty great for someone to make an encyclopedia of politicians, who donated to them, and what policies they vote for.

Basically, an easy way to look up who owns your local Congress person.

Expand full comment

Open secrets.org tracks donations to pols. Dark money orgs can’t be tracked tho.

Expand full comment

Report on what is happening to local governments. Election deniers trying to change makeup of local governments.

As an example - Alachua County Florida, previously targeted by DeSantis, is now swamped by dark money tied to him and his associates, themselves tied to recent "ghost candidate" schemes. Local newspaper headline: "Series of mailers, Facebook posts make blatantly false claims about opponents." See "save Our Vote Alachua" on FB.

Expand full comment

Your exposing the secret roots of dark money in USA politics and the Supreme Court would be great!

Your work is profoundly revealing! Thank you. 🌈

Expand full comment

I appreciate the calling out of corporate and individual behavior that is inconsistent with stated positions tremendously. Please do this for people and organizations on both sides of the aisle so that you build a position of neutrality and increased credibility.

Expand full comment

Build a position of neutrality and credibility? As if they aren't already?

Expand full comment

If you could point out the Democrats who have engaged in seditious plans to stage a coup, I'm sure he'd be willing to call out THEIR enablers also...

Expand full comment

I am curious as to how our elected representatives have increased their net worth over the years that they have been in office. It seems to me that with publicly available records you might be able to track the growth and see if they have used insider information and special deals to increase net worth. I am amazed at how most of these people start at a modest net worth yet end up as multimillionaires by the time they leave office. Maybe you could research one person from each party each week and share their "secrets to success".

Expand full comment

A good start would be to ban Congressional stock trading https://popular.info/p/how-to-make-congress-less-corrupt

Expand full comment