In California there is a code section in place that allows in prosecuting sexual offenses “uncharged conduct” to establish not just a pattern of behavior but also a propensity to commit sexual offenses such as the charged sexual offenses. So claims like Ramirez’s are evidence of propensity to commit Ford’s claims with that concept. (CA …
In California there is a code section in place that allows in prosecuting sexual offenses “uncharged conduct” to establish not just a pattern of behavior but also a propensity to commit sexual offenses such as the charged sexual offenses. So claims like Ramirez’s are evidence of propensity to commit Ford’s claims with that concept. (CA Evid Code 1108). A federal rule rule 414, allows similar evidence in molestation cases.
In California there is a code section in place that allows in prosecuting sexual offenses “uncharged conduct” to establish not just a pattern of behavior but also a propensity to commit sexual offenses such as the charged sexual offenses. So claims like Ramirez’s are evidence of propensity to commit Ford’s claims with that concept. (CA Evid Code 1108). A federal rule rule 414, allows similar evidence in molestation cases.