I respectfully disagree with you, Mr. Legum. Vance did not stay on topic and did not ahow empathy towards anyone. He avoided answering questions by inserting other subjects onto his responses and he did not acknowledge the truth during the very few times Walz "confronted " him. Vance is still, and will always be, an ambitious and cruel m…
I respectfully disagree with you, Mr. Legum. Vance did not stay on topic and did not ahow empathy towards anyone. He avoided answering questions by inserting other subjects onto his responses and he did not acknowledge the truth during the very few times Walz "confronted " him. Vance is still, and will always be, an ambitious and cruel monster. He is more than ready to take over as second-in-command, if Trump gets away with it. Please do not normalize Vance, just because he shook hands and smiled at his overly nice and solicitous rival.
I respectfully disagree with you, Mr. Legum. Vance did not stay on topic and did not ahow empathy towards anyone. He avoided answering questions by inserting other subjects onto his responses and he did not acknowledge the truth during the very few times Walz "confronted " him. Vance is still, and will always be, an ambitious and cruel monster. He is more than ready to take over as second-in-command, if Trump gets away with it. Please do not normalize Vance, just because he shook hands and smiled at his overly nice and solicitous rival.
Every time Vance started his replies with “First of all..” I turned to my friend and said “That means he’s not going to answer the question.”
Waltz missed several opportunities to reveal Vance’s lies. The few times he dis were good, but he does not have the “prosecutor” instinct of Harris